Marketwired Blog

Number of followers and fans versus number of brand mentions



#smmeasure logo

Just when I thought our inaugural chat last week was going to be the peak of its existence, even more of you showed up for the second #smmeasure weekly chat.  The total number of tweets almost doubled from 400 last week to 700 this week.  I want to thank everyone who participated and helped spread the word.  A big thanks to Sysomos’ Community Manager Sheldon Levine @sysomos for co-hosting the chat.

Last week, we started the chat with high-level questions.  This week, we changed it up a bit to discuss the number of followers and fans versus brand-mention debate.  Below is just a small taste of the great conversation we had.  A full transcript is also available.

Q1: What’s more important to you? Followers/fans vs. brand mentions?

Followers/fans are more important

  • @photojunkie:  “Chicken/Egg. hopefully it’s your followers that bring your brand mentions to the medium. That’s the ideal.”
  • @Marketwire:  “Building followers is just as important. Having an audience increases the opportunity for mentions.”
  • @GetPushing:  “having a sizable aud/following is good for initial looks too. Could persuade som1, potential brand ambassador to follow.”

Brand mentions

  • @BrandEngineers:  “While both are important, mentions reveal advocates of the brand and valuable engagement with the audience.”
  • @MichaelNus:  “Mentions cuz while you may have many fans, if they are not engaged they just stagnate. If they are talking, your reach multiplies”

Both

  • @EvolveTom:  “Both are important. Brand mentions could be potential fans.. just need to convert them so you can deliver messaging directly.”
  • @GetPushing:  “Difficult b/c both have value. Fans/followers = more chance ppl “hear” what you put out. Mentions means there’s discussion.”
  • @theelusivefish:  “It depends on the goal? Build channel? Then fans/followers. Broader awarenesss? Then brand mention.”
  • @40deuce:  “Having mentions means people are talking about, while having fans means people are also listening to you”

Q2:  Which ranks higher on the priority list? Growing followers/fans vs. growing discussions?

  • @brightmatrix:  “I say growing discussions. I’ve seen followers build naturally over time, if you have good info & content to share.”
  • @brightmatrix:  “Followers w/o discussion from them is strange. Like standing in a room with a bunch of folks just staring at you.”
  • @nigellegg:  “through growing discussions you will grow followers organically”
  • @hust0058:  “discussion is where the magic happens, not as important if they don’t turn into followers IMO”
  • @casiestewart:  “if you generate good content and discussion your following will grow along with your engagement”
  • @KyleMcShane:  “growing discussions is much more important. a follower without engagement is nothing. also convos will lead to more followers”

Q3:  What would you rather have? Having a few key people mentioning your brand vs. having masses of random people?

  • @safekidszone:  “I would love masses of random people mentioning my brand. Especially since some among them will be key people. Easy answer.”
  • @marketwire:  “A user with 200 followers might be an influencer outside of Twitter. My answer: masses rather than a few key influencers
  • @nigellegg:  “through growing discussions you will grow followers organically”
  • @hust0058:  “discussion is where the magic happens, not as important if they don’t turn into followers IMO”
  • @casiestewart:  “if you generate good content and discussion your following will grow along with your engagement”
  • @KyleMcShane:  “growing discussions is much more important. a follower without engagement is nothing. also convos will lead to more followers”

Some bonus tweets that I had to include.  When you join a chat full of insightful, informative and amusing Twitter users, this is what you get:

  • @danperezfilms:  “Gaining thousands of followers = Good. Getting to know your few hundred followers = better”
  • @tamara:  “D.E.S.I.R.E.D = Disclose Engage Support Integrate Reward Evaluate Deliver. And the objs & measurements assoc w/ each”
  • @Marketwire:  “Be S.M.A.R.T = Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic/Relevant, and Timely”
  • @casiestewart:  “people would rather hear from ‘person at x company’ than just ‘x company’ – business need to get this!”
  • @MichaelNus:  “Another good acronym for engagement F.A.R.T = Friendly, Active, Relationship-building, Tangible”
  • @TsarKasim:  “K.I.S.S.: “Keep it simple, stupid.”
  • @theblogstudio:  “Engaging Online While Also Engaging Offline is Best Strategy.”

Check back here every week for #smmeasure announcements and weekly questions.  If you have any questions or specific topics that you would like us to discuss in the future, please tweet @smmeasure or @marketwire.  Keep track of all of the #smmeasure chat recaps.

Join the Social Media Corner LinkedIn Group and Marketwire Facebook page and let’s continue the conversation again next Thursday, 9:00 am PST, 11:00 am CST, 12:00 pm EST.

Until next time,

Nick


Related posts:



Tags: , ,

Featured Posts

Does Good Social Media Mean Good PR?

[By Jason Mollica] Over the years, the silos of public relations and marketing have broken down so much that we now ...

Read More

Guiding PR Students for Success in Today’s World

By Jason Mollica At one point in our careers we were inexperienced at writing news releases, pitching the media, and understanding ...

Read More

Marketwired Teams Give Back to Their Communities

Marketwired employees believe in making a difference that extends beyond providing communication solutions for their clients. To give them time to devote ...

Read More

The 7 Deadly Sins of Any PR Professional

By Aaron Broverman Please forgive us for getting a little biblical this month, but we wondered what those seven things were ...

Read More



Follow Me